NUMBERS 1:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the tabernacle of the congregation, on the first (echad) day of the second month, in the second year after they were come out of the land of Egypt, saying,
Here, the word "echad" is used as an ordinal value. It indicates the position of that day in a sequence of days.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 0, as an ordinal: 1
NUMBERS 1:18 And they assembled all the congregation together on the first (echad) day of the second month, and they declared their pedigrees after their families, by the house of their fathers, according to the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, by their polls.
Here, the word "echad" is used as an ordinal value. It indicates the position of that day within a sequence of days.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 0, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 1:41 Those that were numbered of them, even of the tribe of Asher, were forty and one (echad) thousand and five hundred.
Here, the word "echad" is plainly used in listing the sum of the adult men of Asher. It is used numerically, as part of a quantity, and does not indicate a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 1, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 1:44 These are those that were numbered, which Moses and Aaron numbered, and the princes of Israel, being twelve men: each one (echad) was for the house of his fathers.
In English, the compound pronoun "everyone" means "all of the people." The word "one" is sometimes used as a non-compound modified pronoun. An example of this (which is also used in Numbers 1:44) is "every one," which means something like "every single person or thing." The non-compound modified pronoun differs from the ordinary compound pronoun in that it places greater emphasis on the word "one." That is, it places greater emphasis on the individual components of the group, and not on the group itself. Therefore, when the word "one" is used as a non-compound modified pronoun in the English language, it has a numerical function. In this verse, the word "echad" is used in this way: as a pronoun with a numeric function, placing emphasis on each individual prince within the group of princes. It says nothing of a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 2, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 2:16 All that were numbered in the camp of Reuben were an hundred thousand and fifty and one (echad) thousand and four hundred and fifty, throughout their armies. And they shall set forth in the second rank.
Here, the word "echad" is plainly used in listing the sum of men in "the second rank." It is used numerically, as part of a quantity, and does not indicate a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 3, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 2:28 And his host, and those that were numbered of them, were forty and one (echad) thousand and five hundred.
Here, the word "echad" is obviously used in listing the sum of men of the tribe of Asher. It is used numerically, as part of a quantity, and does not indicate a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 4, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:11 And the priest shall offer the one (echad) for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering, and make an atonement for him, for that he sinned by the dead, and shall hallow his head that same day.
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:11. Two (turtledoves) are mentioned in this verse. Is this a "unified" turtledove that is to be offered for a sin offering, or is it a single turtledove of the two? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 5, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:11 And the priest shall offer the one for a sin offering, and the other (echad) for a burnt offering, and make an atonement for him, for that he sinned by the dead, and shall hallow his head that same day.
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:11. Two (turtledoves) are mentioned in this verse. Is this a "unified" turtledove that is to be offered for a burnt offering, or is it a single turtledove of the two? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 6, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:14 And he shall offer his offering unto the LORD, one (echad) he lamb of the first year without blemish for a burnt offering, and one ewe lamb of the first year without blemish for a sin offering, and one ram without blemish for peace offerings,
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:14. Is a "unified" he lamb to be offered for a burnt offering, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 7, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:14 And he shall offer his offering unto the LORD, one he lamb of the first year without blemish for a burnt offering, and one (echad) ewe lamb of the first year without blemish for a sin offering, and one ram without blemish for peace offerings,
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:14. Is a "unified" ewe lamb to be offered for a sin offering, or a single ewe lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of ewe lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 8, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:14 And he shall offer his offering unto the LORD, one he lamb of the first year without blemish for a burnt offering, and one ewe lamb of the first year without blemish for a sin offering, and one (echad) ram without blemish for peace offerings,
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:14. Is a "unified" ram to be offered for a peace offering, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of rams.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 9, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:19 And the priest shall take the sodden shoulder of the ram, and one (echad) unleavened cake out of the basket, and one unleavened wafer, and shall put them upon the hands of the Nazarite, after the hair of his separation is shaven:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:19. Is a "unified" unleavened cake to be taken from the basket, or a single unleavened cake? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of unleavened cakes.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 10, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 6:19 And the priest shall take the sodden shoulder of the ram, and one unleavened cake out of the basket, and one (echad) unleavened wafer, and shall put them upon the hands of the Nazarite, after the hair of his separation is shaven:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 6:19. Is a "unified" unleavened wafer to be placed in the hands of the Nazarite, or is this a single unleavened wafer? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not union of unleavened wafers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 11, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:11 And the LORD said unto Moses, They shall offer their offering, each (echad) prince on his day, for the dedicating of the altar.
Is this a "unified" prince (referred to in the plural: "they shall offer their offering"), or did each individual prince offer on separate days ("...each prince on his day...")? The rest of Numbers 7 records the offerings that every one of the twelve princes offered; one prince at a time, on twelve separate days. Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of princes who are to offer "on his day," not a unification of the entire group of princes.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 12, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:13 And his offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:13. Did Nahshon offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 13, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:13 And his offering was one silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:13. Did Nahshon offer a "unified" silver bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 14, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:14 One (echad) spoon of ten shekels of gold, full of incense:
Did Nahshon offer a "unified" spoon, or a single spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 15, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:15 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:15. Did Nahshon offer a "unified" young bullock, or a single young bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 16, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:15 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:15. Did Nahshon offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of rams.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 17, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:15 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:15. Did Nahshon offer a "unifed" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 18, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:16 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Did Nahshon offer a "unified" kid, or a single kid? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 19, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:19 He offered for his offering one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:19. Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 20, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:19 He offered for his offering one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:19. Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" silver bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 21, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:20 One (echad) spoon of gold of ten shekels, full of incense:
Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" gold spoon, or a single gold spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 22, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:21 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:21. Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" bullock, or a single bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 23, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:21 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:21. Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of rams.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 24, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:21 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:21. Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 25, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:22 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Did Nethaneel offer a "unified" goat, or a single goat? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 26, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:25 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:25. Is this a "unified" silver charger, or did Eliab offer a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 27, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:25 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:25. Did Eliab offer a "unified" bowl, or a single bowl (weighing 70 shekels)? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 28, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:26 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Is this a "unified" spoon, or a single spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 29, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:27 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:27. Is this a "unified" bullock, or a single young bullock that Eliab offered? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 30, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:27 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:27. Is this a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 31, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:27 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:27. Again, is this a "unified" lamb, or did Eliab offer a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 32, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:28 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Did Eliab offer a "unified" goat, or a single goat for a sin offering? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of goats, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 33, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:31 His offering was one (echad) silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:31. Is this a "unified" silver charger, or did Elizur offer a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of chargers, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 34, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:31 His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:31. Is this a "unified" silver bowl, or did Elizur offer a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of bowls, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 35, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:32 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Likewise, did Elizur offer a "unified" spoon, or a single golden spoon? Here too, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 36, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:33 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:33. Is this a "unified" bullock, or a single young bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 37, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:33 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:33. Is this a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 38, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:33 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:33. Is this a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 39, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:34 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Did Elizur offer a "unified" small goat, or a single goat? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of small goats, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 40, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:37 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:37. Is this a "unified" silver charger, or did Shelumiel offer a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 41, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:37 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:37. Is this a "unified" bowl, or a single bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 42, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:38 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Is this a "unified" spoon, or a single spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of golden spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 43, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:39 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:39. Is this a "unified" bullock, or a single young bullock that Shelumiel offered? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 44, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:39 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:39. Is this a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 45, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:39 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:39. Again, is this a "unified" lamb, or did Shelumiel offer a single lamb for a burnt offering? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 46, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:40 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Did Shelumiel offer a "unified" goat, or a single goat for a sin offering? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of goats, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 47, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:43 His offering was one (echad) silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, a silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:43. Did Eliasaph offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 48, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:43 His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, a (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:43. (It may be difficult to see, but in this verse, the word "echad" was translated into English as the word "a"). Did Elisaph offer a "unified" bowl, or a single bowl of that weight? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 49, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:44 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Is this a "unified" spoon, or a single spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 50, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:45 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:45. Did Elisaph offer a "unified" bullock, or a single bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of bullocks, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 51, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:45 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:45. Did Elisaph offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 52, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:45 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:45. Did Elisaph offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb of the first year? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of lambs, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 53, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:46 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Was a "unified" goat, or a single goat offered for a sin offering? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 54, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:49 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:49. Was this a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 55, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:49 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:49. Was this a "unified" silver bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 56, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:50 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Did Ammihud offer a "unified," or a single golden spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of golden spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 57, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:51 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:51. Did Ammihud offer a "unified" bullock, or a single bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 58, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:51 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:51. Did Ammihud offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of rams.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 59, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:51 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:51. Did Ammihud offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of rams.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 60, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:52 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Is this a "unified," or a single goat? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 61, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:55 His offering was one (echad) silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:55. Did Gamaliel offer a "unified" charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 62, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:55 His offering was one silver charger of the weight of an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:55. Is this a "unified" bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 63, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:56 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Is this a "unified" spoon, or did Gamaliel offer a single golden spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of golden spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 64, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:57 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:57. Did Gamaliel offer a "unified" bullock, or a single bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of bullocks.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 65, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:57 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:57. Is this a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 66, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:57 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:57. Did Gamaliel offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 67, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:58 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Again, is this a "unified" goat, or a single kid of the goats? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of young goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 68, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:61 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:61. Did Abidan offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 69, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:61 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:62. Again, did Abidan offer a "unified" silver bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here again, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 70, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:62 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Did Abidan offer a "unified" golden spoon, or a single golden spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a union of golden spoons.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 71, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:63 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:63. Did Abidan offer a "unified" young bullock, or a single young bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of young bullocks, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 72, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:63 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:63. Again, did Abidan offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here too, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 73, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:63 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:63. Once again, did Abidan offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here too, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 74, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:64 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Is this a "unified" kid, or a single kid from the goats? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of young goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 75, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:67 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:67. Did Ahiezer offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity not a unification of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 76, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:67 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:67. Again, did Ahiezer offer a "united" bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 77, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:68 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Did Ahiezer offer a "unified" spoon, or a single golden spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of spoons, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 78, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:69 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:69. Did Ahiezer offer a "unified" bullock, or a single young bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of bullocks, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 79, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:69 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:69. Again, did Ahiezer offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here too, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 80, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:69 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:69. Once again, did Ahiezer offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here too, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 81, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:70 One (echad) kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Is this a "unified" kid, or a single kid from the goats? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of goats.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 82, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:73 His offering was one (echad) silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the first of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:73. Did Pagiel offer a "unified" silver charger, or a single silver charger? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of silver chargers.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 83, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:73 His offering was one silver charger, the weight whereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one (echad) silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
This is the second of two instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:73. Again, did Pagiel offer a "united" bowl, or a single silver bowl? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of silver bowls.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 84, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:74 One (echad) golden spoon of ten shekels, full of incense:
Did Pagiel offer a "unified" spoon, or a single golden spoon? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of spoons, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 85, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:75 One (echad) young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the first of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:75. Did Pagiel offer a "unified" bullock, or a single young bullock? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of bullocks, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 86, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:75 One young bullock, one (echad) ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the second of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:75. Again, did Pagiel offer a "unified" ram, or a single ram? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity of rams, not a union.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 87, as an ordinal: 2
NUMBERS 7:75 One young bullock, one ram, one (echad) lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
This is the third of three instances of the word "echad" in Numbers 7:75. Once again, did Pagiel offer a "unified" lamb, or a single lamb? Here, the word "echad" indicates a quantity, not a unification of lambs.
Subtotal for Numbers: Echad as a union: 0, as a quantity: 88, as an ordinal: 2
Continued in part 2 of this document . . .